"The Bible talks about people who walk away from the faith--make shipwreck of the faith--all the rest of these things. Why would I stand before you and take the crazy position that God does not fail to save his elect people? Becasue its what the Bible teaches."
Why would I take the crazy Lutheran position that God does not fail to save his elect people AND people walk away from the faith and make shipwreck of the faith? Because that is what the Bible teaches.
James White is a good speaker. But if I accepted the emphasis of his arguments, I would wind up believing in universal salvation, not Calvinism.
"Why would I take the crazy Lutheran position that God does not fail to save his elect people AND people walk away from the faith and make shipwreck of the faith? Because that is what the Bible teaches."
Hi Jeff,
I grant the point (I think you're making) that using the phrase, "that is what the Bible teaches" depends on one's interpretation of the Bible. I do not want to speak for Dr. White, but I assume he would qualify his statement by referring to the discipline of exegesis in regard to interpretation.
On the other hand, I have engaged a number of people in dialog (including, Roman Catholics, Reformed, Lutherans, cultists, etc.) that think merely citing a passage of scripture is akin to "that is what the Bible teaches."
James White is a good speaker. But if I accepted the emphasis of his arguments, I would wind up believing in universal salvation, not Calvinism.
Perhaps you would, others would not. There are a number of people that embrace Reformed soteriology that have avoided universalism. From my perspective, the question for you to ponder is, how is it, that Dr. White does not accept universalism? How is it that none of the major classical Reformed creeds and statements of faith embrace universalism?
"He that has ever so little examined the citations of writers cannot doubt how little credit the quotations deserve when the originals are wanting"
xx
Looking for an Obscure Luther Quote? Chances are if you've wound up on this site, you're looking for information on an obscure quote said to come from Martin Luther or one of the other Protestant Reformers. This blog has been compiling information on obscure Reformation quotes for over a decade. Use the search engines below to look for your particular obscure quote.
“Let nobody suppose that he has tasted the Holy Scriptures sufficiently unless he has ruled over the churches with the prophets for a hundred years. Therefore there is something wonderful, first, about John the Baptist; second, about Christ; third, about the apostles...“We are beggars. That is true.” - Martin Luther
"It is true that the best apologetics can be given only when the system of truth is well known. But it is also true that the system of truth is not well known except it be seen in its opposition to error."- Cornelius Van Til
"But a most pernicious error widely prevails that Scripture has only so much weight as is conceded to it by the consent of the church. As if the eternal and inviolable truth of God depended upon the decision of men!"- John Calvin
"The Scriptures obtain full authority among believers only when men regard them as having sprung from heaven, as if there the living words of God were heard."- John Calvin
This is the best book available on Sola Scriptura. For Protestants, it will help you understand and defend sola scriptura. For Catholics, this book will help you understand exactly what Protestants mean by sola scriptura, rather than what you think it means. I highly recommend getting this book, it never leaves my desk, and serves as a valuable reference tool.
3 comments:
part 2 is up also.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XhK0urKAyYw&feature=youtu.be
"The Bible talks about people who walk away from the faith--make shipwreck of the faith--all the rest of these things. Why would I stand before you and take the crazy position that God does not fail to save his elect people? Becasue its what the Bible teaches."
Why would I take the crazy Lutheran position that God does not fail to save his elect people AND people walk away from the faith and make shipwreck of the faith? Because that is what the Bible teaches.
James White is a good speaker. But if I accepted the emphasis of his arguments, I would wind up believing in universal salvation, not Calvinism.
"Why would I take the crazy Lutheran position that God does not fail to save his elect people AND people walk away from the faith and make shipwreck of the faith? Because that is what the Bible teaches."
Hi Jeff,
I grant the point (I think you're making) that using the phrase, "that is what the Bible teaches" depends on one's interpretation of the Bible. I do not want to speak for Dr. White, but I assume he would qualify his statement by referring to the discipline of exegesis in regard to interpretation.
On the other hand, I have engaged a number of people in dialog (including, Roman Catholics, Reformed, Lutherans, cultists, etc.) that think merely citing a passage of scripture is akin to "that is what the Bible teaches."
James White is a good speaker. But if I accepted the emphasis of his arguments, I would wind up believing in universal salvation, not Calvinism.
Perhaps you would, others would not. There are a number of people that embrace Reformed soteriology that have avoided universalism. From my perspective, the question for you to ponder is, how is it, that Dr. White does not accept universalism? How is it that none of the major classical Reformed creeds and statements of faith embrace universalism?
Post a Comment