Showing posts with label Mailbox. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Mailbox. Show all posts

Wednesday, December 26, 2007

Luther said he would rather be ruled by a competent Turk than an incompetent Christian?

From The Beggars Mailbox: The Wise Turk:

"I was listening to the KFUO broadcast IssuesEtc and the host says he wished some Luther scholar would point him to where Luther is believed to say that he would rather be ruled by a competent Turk than an incompetent Christian. Or something to that effect. I thought of you since you are such a scholar."

With all the presidential hype surrounding Mitt Romney as a Mormon candidate, I was almost certain this quote would pop up. I'm keen on not "reinventing the wheel" so to speak, so if someone else has already done some work on a subject, I'd rather simply refer to their efforts. Gene Edward Veith has posted an article entitled, Luther's "Wise Turk" Quote He Didn't Say (and this earlier post as well The Wise Turk Quote). Please read the article and the discussion. Veith  states,"Right now, the quotation, while perhaps true in what it says, seems to be phony, making me wonder what else Luther didn't say." I would agree that I've never come across anything that verifies this statement came from Luther.  The quote is certainly not from the following from Luther's treatise, An Open Letter to the Christian Nobility:
"It is said that there is no better temporal rule anywhere than among the Turks, who have neither spiritual nor temporal law, but only their Koran; and we must confess that there is no more shameful rule than among us, with our spiritual and temporal law, so that there is no estate which lives according to the light of nature, still less according to Holy Scripture."
This quote really isn't all that close, but has popped up on the Internet as the reference. Veith's entry shows that if one goes through Luther's writings about Islam, one will not find any concession that it would be better to be ruled by them rather than an incompetent Christian. Luther at one point in 1528 wrote, "But as the pope is Antichrist, so the Turk is the very devil."

Friday, December 14, 2007

Another Mailbox

Since James shared his email I thought I would share two of mine.

First, I also got an email from "Michael the Theologian In Training" which was also addressed to "Luther" which asked

I am in need of aid with your theology. You claim that we, human beings, are saved by faith alone. Please, define for me "saved".

I wasn't planning on answering Michael because I suspected a baiting, but what the heck. I'll give you the answer I would give my five year old - "go to heaven when we die". If you need more detail Michael, please ask. But don't call me Luther, you can save that for James.

A more interesting email is from a fiesty Catholic:

It is good to see a little light being shone on a blogsite which seems to thrive on existing in perpetual darkness.

For an appreciation of the Role of Mary in God's Plan for Redemption you should read the Book of Ecclesiasticus.

Oops! Sorry! You don't have that book in your so-called Bible do you?

Are Protestants really Christian?

For the answer to this why not access [snip] If you dare!

I did dare and managed to survive. I am leaving out the link to his site as he could just be a link troll (he appears to be selling materials). The site wasn't overally interesting, it seemed to be targeted to pushing the Traditionalist viewpoint.

Tuesday, December 11, 2007

Mailbox

Today's Mailbox:

I get a lot of e-mail. I get a lot of things from people thankful for something I've written, and I do get critiques as well. I get people writing with genuine questions, and I also get people near exam time needing a paper on Luther. Here are some recent letters:

My friend Turretinfan sent me the following "heads up" which gave me such a chuckle I had to share it-

TQuid, Steve Ray's got an insult-riddled response to your critique of his citation in his book Crossing the Tiber, posted. I noted with amusement his claim: "It seems he is a James White wanna-be, though he’s no where near as clever." It's funny because he's trying to insult your intelligence and poison the well, while misspelling "nowhere." It's hard to take that guy seriously, but lots of people read his stuff. Ah well. May God be glorified, -Turretinfan

Mr. Ray's response was only an 11 page PDF file. I'm very flattered Mr. Ray took time away from his pilgrimages and promotional work to compose such a heart felt response [by the way, the Roman Catholic typo-police got me on that one]. I will deal with Mr. Ray this weekend.

And here's another letter from my mailbox, in which the writer thinks my name is "Luther":

Luther, perhaps you could help me with one of my many theological inquiries. When it comes to Sola Scriptura, I have my doubts towards its dependability ever since I read Bart Ehrman's book, Misquoting Jesus. The book has leads me to believe that the Scriptures are flawed because of human error. Also there is the matter of interpretation. Is the Bible to be taken literally or metaphorically? How am I to interpret meaning from a source of authority which is flawed? Theologian In Training

Well, the premise of Ehrman is flawed. Because there is not a perfect original copy of each book of the Bible does not mean we do not have reliable text. I suggest an in-depth study of textual criticism.

Finally, Carrie has sent me a recent batch of e-mails filled with research that I've thought about all day, and will think about the rest of the week. They were TRUE blessings! Thanks Carrie!