Thanks for posting this James. Dr. White clearly won this debate. I have most of Dr. White's RC debates, they're very entertaining. My all time favorite is still the Papal Infallibility debate against Tim Staples; an absolute drubbing.
I just finished listening to this debate this morning. Dr. Sungenis helped demonstrate the unspoken "assumptions" that go into believing in Mary's assumption. In fact, I found the argumentation of Dr. Sungenis more interesting than Dr. White's. It appeared to me, a number of things had to be granted first in order for their to be such a thing as Mary's assumption. There's no direct meaningful evidence, so the only way to prove it is via arguments from authority. I'm so used to Rome's cyber-defenders trying to appeal to this or that historical fact about Mary's assumption. Dr. Sungenis was wise enough to realize... there really are no meaningful historical facts proving it.
From my perspective, Dr. Sungenis didn't present a compelling case- but I don't think any of Rome's defenders could have done any better. Sungenis gets an A+ for actually being brave enough to address this subject in a live setting against Dr. White. I'd also give him an A+ for simply being calmly honest at certain points about the lack of factual data.
On the other hand, this might as well have been an argument about "authority," instead of about Mary- in which case, I did not find Robert's case compelling.
I truly believe Dr.Sungenis has made a point about Dr. White! If you take all of the declassified photos of the green martians that have been captured over the years and put them next to Dr. White with his face, neck and hands painted green you will see a similarity! Other than that, I cannot believe the basis he argues from supports the bodily assumption of Mary!
Now it seems to me this debate underscores what the Apostle Paul was warning about when he warned this:::>
2Co 11:12 And what I am doing I will continue to do, in order to undermine the claim of those who would like to claim that in their boasted mission they work on the same terms as we do. 2Co 11:13 For such men are false apostles, deceitful workmen, disguising themselves as apostles of Christ. 2Co 11:14 And no wonder, for even Satan disguises himself as an angel of light. 2Co 11:15 So it is no surprise if his servants, also, disguise themselves as servants of righteousness. Their end will correspond to their deeds.
Dr. Sungenis is skilled at what he is doing in this debate, no doubt. However it is nevertheless a disguise and deception of high quality!
Obviously I believe Dr. White knocked down all Dr. Sungenis' arguments very well.
Dr Sungenis gave up Scriptures and "Holy Tradition", for Sola Ecclesia. His use of the Acts 15 council assumes that the Magisterium has the same authority as the Apostles had. It should be really scary for roman catholics to base their entire faith upon this kind of argumentation.
One thing I thought about after listening to the debate, and I don't recall it being brought up:
Dr. Sungenis was very insistent on the Pope have authority to decide this or that. The problem is not that a church from the past claims authority, it's the claim for infallible authority.
Rome is stuck with the dogma of the Assumption because of infallible authority.
"He that has ever so little examined the citations of writers cannot doubt how little credit the quotations deserve when the originals are wanting"
xx
Looking for an Obscure Luther Quote? Chances are if you've wound up on this site, you're looking for information on an obscure quote said to come from Martin Luther or one of the other Protestant Reformers. This blog has been compiling information on obscure Reformation quotes for over a decade. Use the search engines below to look for your particular obscure quote.
“Let nobody suppose that he has tasted the Holy Scriptures sufficiently unless he has ruled over the churches with the prophets for a hundred years. Therefore there is something wonderful, first, about John the Baptist; second, about Christ; third, about the apostles...“We are beggars. That is true.” - Martin Luther
"It is true that the best apologetics can be given only when the system of truth is well known. But it is also true that the system of truth is not well known except it be seen in its opposition to error."- Cornelius Van Til
"But a most pernicious error widely prevails that Scripture has only so much weight as is conceded to it by the consent of the church. As if the eternal and inviolable truth of God depended upon the decision of men!"- John Calvin
"The Scriptures obtain full authority among believers only when men regard them as having sprung from heaven, as if there the living words of God were heard."- John Calvin
This is the best book available on Sola Scriptura. For Protestants, it will help you understand and defend sola scriptura. For Catholics, this book will help you understand exactly what Protestants mean by sola scriptura, rather than what you think it means. I highly recommend getting this book, it never leaves my desk, and serves as a valuable reference tool.
8 comments:
I assume this was before Sungenis fell out of favor with his religious superiors.
Thanks for posting this James. Dr. White clearly won this debate. I have most of Dr. White's RC debates, they're very entertaining. My all time favorite is still the Papal Infallibility debate against Tim Staples; an absolute drubbing.
I just finished listening to this debate this morning. Dr. Sungenis helped demonstrate the unspoken "assumptions" that go into believing in Mary's assumption. In fact, I found the argumentation of Dr. Sungenis more interesting than Dr. White's. It appeared to me, a number of things had to be granted first in order for their to be such a thing as Mary's assumption. There's no direct meaningful evidence, so the only way to prove it is via arguments from authority. I'm so used to Rome's cyber-defenders trying to appeal to this or that historical fact about Mary's assumption. Dr. Sungenis was wise enough to realize... there really are no meaningful historical facts proving it.
From my perspective, Dr. Sungenis didn't present a compelling case- but I don't think any of Rome's defenders could have done any better. Sungenis gets an A+ for actually being brave enough to address this subject in a live setting against Dr. White. I'd also give him an A+ for simply being calmly honest at certain points about the lack of factual data.
On the other hand, this might as well have been an argument about "authority," instead of about Mary-
in which case, I did not find Robert's case compelling.
In case on nitpickers....
"order for their" should be... "order for there"
I truly believe Dr.Sungenis has made a point about Dr. White! If you take all of the declassified photos of the green martians that have been captured over the years and put them next to Dr. White with his face, neck and hands painted green you will see a similarity! Other than that, I cannot believe the basis he argues from supports the bodily assumption of Mary!
Now it seems to me this debate underscores what the Apostle Paul was warning about when he warned this:::>
2Co 11:12 And what I am doing I will continue to do, in order to undermine the claim of those who would like to claim that in their boasted mission they work on the same terms as we do.
2Co 11:13 For such men are false apostles, deceitful workmen, disguising themselves as apostles of Christ.
2Co 11:14 And no wonder, for even Satan disguises himself as an angel of light.
2Co 11:15 So it is no surprise if his servants, also, disguise themselves as servants of righteousness. Their end will correspond to their deeds.
Dr. Sungenis is skilled at what he is doing in this debate, no doubt. However it is nevertheless a disguise and deception of high quality!
Obviously I believe Dr. White knocked down all Dr. Sungenis' arguments very well.
michael said...
Other than that, I cannot believe the basis he argues from supports the bodily assumption of Mary!
Well, if you can't use history, tradition, or the Bible, what's left?
Dr Sungenis gave up Scriptures and "Holy Tradition", for Sola Ecclesia. His use of the Acts 15 council assumes that the Magisterium has the same authority as the Apostles had. It should be really scary for roman catholics to base their entire faith upon this kind of argumentation.
One thing I thought about after listening to the debate, and I don't recall it being brought up:
Dr. Sungenis was very insistent on the Pope have authority to decide this or that. The problem is not that a church from the past claims authority, it's the claim for infallible authority.
Rome is stuck with the dogma of the Assumption because of infallible authority.
Post a Comment