Apr 8, '11, 11:10 am | |||
| |||
Re: SPLIT: Catholics claim to be one and same church Christ founded. I utterly reject that claim on biblical and historical grounds. Quote:
Moses - "This is the blessing with which Moses the man of God blessed the children of Israel before his death." (Deut. 33:1) __________________ Protons have mass? I didn't even know they were Catholic! |
Apr 8, '11, 11:13 am | |||
| |||
Re: SPLIT: Catholics claim to be one and same church Christ founded. I utterly reject that claim on biblical and historical grounds. Quote:
When St. Paul imposed his hands on St. Timothy, he passed on a legitimate apostolic authority, "entrusted" the "truth" to him, and imparted the gift of "the Holy Spirit" for the safekeeping and preservation of the Gospel. __________________ Protons have mass? I didn't even know they were Catholic! |
Apr 8, '11, 11:59 am | |||
| |||
Re: SPLIT: Catholics claim to be one and same church Christ founded. I utterly reject that claim on biblical and historical grounds. Quote:
Is that the "Official" interpretation of that passage or is that your interpretation as a "Private Theologian"? If "Official", is it "Historic"? Does it exclude "Laity" as recipients of Paul's exhortation? |
Apr 8, '11, 3:40 pm | |||
| |||
Re: SPLIT: Catholics claim to be one and same church Christ founded. I utterly reject that claim on biblical and historical grounds. Quote:
That said, I'm willing to bet that the referenced link would have no problem getting a Nihil Obstat and an Imprimatur if the writer chose to do so. It's certainly "Historic." There are 4 generations of apostolic succession in Scripture: "What you have heard from me before many witnesses entrust to faithful men who will be able to teach others also" (2 Tim. 2:2) -- (1) Paul, (2) Timothy, (3) the men that Timothy will entrust the Gospel message to, and (4) the men that they will entrust. One witness to the structure of the early Church is St. Ignatius of Antioch, whose seven authentic letters are dated no later than A.D. 117 or 118, so he must have known some of the apostles themselves, as Antioch was a center of missionary activity frequented by Paul in Acts 11:26–30 and 13:1–3. Ignatius says, "It is fitting in every way . . . that you be knit together in a unified submission, subject to the bishop and presbytery that you may be completely sanctified" (Letter to Ephesians 2:2). Again he says of the Church, "Jesus Christ . . . is the will of the Father, just as the bishops, who are appointed in every land, are the will of Jesus Christ. So it is proper for you to be in harmony with the will of the bishop" (ibid., 3:2–4:1). He also wrote, "It is clear that one should see the bishop as the Lord himself" (ibid., 6:1). These quotes show first that Ignatius considered the bishops of the Church to be the "will of God" (i.e., their office was appointed by God) and second that obedience to the bishop was considered obedience to God himself. In some sense, the bishop represented God in the same way that the apostles did. Yes. Quote:
__________________ Protons have mass? I didn't even know they were Catholic! |
Apr 8, '11, 4:43 pm | |||
| |||
Re: SPLIT: Catholics claim to be one and same church Christ founded. I utterly reject that claim on biblical and historical grounds. Quote:
I read Mr. Michael's article. Maybe you can read a portion of John Chrysostom's sermon in which he exegetes that passage. Chrysostom (349-407): How comes it that not merely among ourselves, but also among Jews and Greeks, he [i. e. Paul] is the wonder of wonders? Is it not from the power of his epistles? whereby not only to the faithful of today, but from his time to this, yea and up to the end, even the appearing of Christ, he has been and will be profitable, and will continue to be so as long as the human race shall last. For as a wall built of adamant, so his writings fortify all the Churches of the known world, and he as a most noble champion stands in the midst, bringing into captivity every thought to the obedience of Christ, casting down imaginations, and every high thing which exalts itself against the knowledge of God, and all this he does by those epistles which he has left to us full of wonders and of Divine wisdom. For his writings are not only useful to us, for the overthrow of false doctrine and the confirmation of the true, but they help not a little towards living a good life. . . . 8. Hear also what he says in his charge to his disciple: “Give heed to reading, to exhortation, to teaching,” and he goes on to show the usefulness of this by adding, “For in doing this thou shalt save both thyself and them that hear thee.” And again he says, “The Lord’s servant must not strive, but be gentle towards all, apt to teach, forbearing;” and he proceeds to say, “But abide thou in the things which thou hast learned, and hast been assured of, knowing of whom thou hast learned them, and that from a babe thou hast known the sacred writings which are able to make thee wise unto salvation,” and again, “Every Scripture is inspired of God, and also profitable for teaching, for reproof, for correction, for instruction which is in righteousness, that the man of God may be complete.” Hear what he adds further in his directions to Titus about the appointment of bishops. “The bishop,” he says, “must be holding to the faithful word which is according to the teaching, that he may be able to convict the gain-sayers.” But how shall any one who is unskillful as these men pretend, be able to convict the gainsayers and stop their mouths? or what need is there to give attention to reading and to the Holy Scriptures, if such a state of unskillfulness is to be welcome among us? Such arguments are mere makeshifts and pretexts, the marks of idleness and sloth. But some one will say, “it is to the priests that these charges are given:” — certainly, for they are the subjects of our discourse. But that the apostle gives the same charge to the laity, hear what he says in another epistle to other than the priesthood: “Let the word of Christ dwell in you richly in all wisdom,” and again, “Let your speech be always with grace seasoned with salt, that ye may know how ye ought to answer each one,” and there is a general charge to all that they “be ready to” render an account of their faith, and to the Thessalonians, he gives the following command: “Build each other up, even as also ye do.” But when he speaks of priests he says, “Let the elders that rule well be counted worthy of double honor, especially those who labor in the word, and in teaching.” For this is the perfection of teaching when the teachers both by what they do, and by what they say as well, bring their disciples to that blessed state of life which Christ appointed for them. For example alone is not enough to instruct others. Nor do I say this of myself; it is our Savior’s own word. “For whosoever shall do and teach them, he shall be called great. Now if doing were the same as teaching, the second word here would be superfluous; and it had been enough to have said “whosoever shall do” simply. But now by distinguishing the two, he shows that practice is one thing, and doctrine another, and that each needs the help of the others in order to complete edification. Thou hearest too what the chosen vessel of Christ says to the Ephesian elders: “Wherefore watch ye, remembering that for the space of three years, I ceased not to admonish every one, night and day, with tears.” NPNF1: Vol. IX, The Christian Priesthood, Book 4, §7-8. |
5 comments:
I'm no official, so I will place my bet on the supreme official, who is the man of God, and has the office to interpret the scripture as pertaining only to the official.
Round and round we go where we stop the Bishop of Rome knows.
...I know that after my departure savage wolves will come in among you, not sparing the flock: and from among your own selves men will rise, speaking perverse things, to draw away the disciples after them. Acts 20:29,30
How can they have no certainty of the passage allegedly defending their position, while having certainty they are avoiding wolves ?
Eric
Good point Eric.
Gotta love Chrysostom :)
How can they have no certainty of the passage allegedly defending their position, while having certainty they are avoiding wolves ?
The gates of hell will never prevail!
Protons have mass? I didn't even know they were Catholic!
In my opinion, he automatically won the argument just by having this witty saying as a motto -- but I'm not infallible, so what do I know? :-)
Post a Comment