....An interesting read from Mr. Sungenis.
Sungenis: "I think it is good, at least compared to what it was about 25 years ago when Catholic apologetics was practically non-existent. But I think it could be much better today if we all banded together and used each other gifts and talents instead of competing with one another. As the saying goes, all ships rise with the tide."
"Overall, I would say that EWTN, Catholic Answers and Hahn-CUF are, for lack of a better term, somewhat milquetoast when it comes to dealing with the more controversial and significant problems occurring in the Church and in the world. My assessment is that they either don’t know where the real battles are or they know and choose to ignore them, and have more or less settled into a politically-correct apologetic."
"I would expect the EWTN-like apostolates to have the lion’s share of the Catholic “apologetics” community, whereas I would expect apostolates like ours to attract the deep thinkers and politically-incorrect crowd. That’s just the nature of the respective animals. But that’s ok. We each have our gifts, strengths and focus. I think God is using us all, but I think He would like to see us all get along much better than we have, and that is what all three groups need to pray for."
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Posts
4 comments:
He's probably right. I'm sure you've read a Robert Sungenis book before. I have read two. I am also sure you have read a Scott Hahn or Patrick Madrid book. I have. There is no question that Sungenis goes much deeper into whichever issue he is tackling, regardless of whether he is correct in his final analysis.
What I thought was interesting was when Robert stated, "I think God is using us all, but I think He would like to see us all get along much better than we have, and that is what all three groups need to pray for."
Simply go back and visit his site from years ago:
http://web.archive.org/web/*/http://catholicintl.com/
He has quite a number of attacks against Keating, Akin, Catholic Answers, etc.
Is it within Reformed Orthodoxy to believe that the Genesis account is not literal, i.e. Adam and Eve are types? I'm just curious.
What I appreciate about Robert Sungenis is that he doesn't (in my estimation) try to defend his position by making Catholicism palatable to Protestants. There are a good many Catholic apologists who do so.
Post a Comment