Someone (correction: Sungenis posted it) posted the video of the Robert Sungenis vs. James White debate (in 25 parts). This was back when Roman Catholics liked Robert Sungensis, and would frequently point to him as their definitive apologist. Somewhere, I’m in the first few rows. If you watch nothing else, watch Chris Arnzen’s introduction in part one.
Part one Part two Part three Part four Part five
Part six Part seven Part eight Part nine Part 10
Part 11 Part 12 Part 13 Part 14 Part 15
Part 16 Part 17 Part 18 Part 19 Part 20
Part 21 Part 22 Part 23 Part 24 Part 25
Part one Part two Part three Part four Part five
Part six Part seven Part eight Part nine Part 10
Part 11 Part 12 Part 13 Part 14 Part 15
Part 16 Part 17 Part 18 Part 19 Part 20
Part 21 Part 22 Part 23 Part 24 Part 25
1 comment:
interesting how the two books are side by side. i have both of them. white's book is a good introduction. i would say that sungenis's book offers better arguments. however, both books are terrible in that they do not interpret paul within the historical context he was in.
Post a Comment