“Which way has God most clearly revealed Himself?”
Sometimes the answer given is “in nature.” This would be a good try for a non-Christian, but the folks that have given me this answer are Christians! The answer of course, is “in Jesus Christ,” and this is the ten-second explanation to the “theology of the cross.” Luther would say something like, “If you want to know God, know Jesus Christ.”
Now, I’ve met quite a few cyber-Lutherans. I think in some cases, Luther’s “theology of the cross” is wrongly used by some of them against Reformed Christians. Many times if a Reformed person even mentions predestination, election, atonement, etc, some Lutherans will quickly take refuge behind the theology of the cross, and say that the Reformed are not talking about Jesus, but rather the hidden God. I always wonder if maybe the theology of the cross is being misapplied in order to maintain a tradition, or is either being misapplied due to a faulty understanding of Reformed theology. Now, I’m not pigeonholing all Lutherans, so please put your guns back in your holsters.
Probably motivated by this post from James White , John Mark over on his Sweet Tea And Theology blog, put something into words that I’ve never been able to relating to this subject. He applied a type of incorrect Lutheran hermeneutic to the Nicene Creed in which everything not mentioning Jesus was stricken from the creed.
Now of course, John Mark is using an example of argumentum ad absurdum, and doing so quite effectively. I doubt of course any Lutheran would agree with his findings. But this is the point isn’t it? Deuteronomy 29:29

2 comments:
Hi Frank-
Thanks for stopping by and your comments. Probably one of the greatest saddnesses I have is seeing the relationship between Lutherans and the Reformed.
I think, if constructive dialog were to occcur, many of our differences could be worked out.
I plan on doing some posts directly to the subject of Lutheranism vs. Calvinism. I hope you'll stick around.
Blessings,
James
Thanks for the acknowledgement. I really should have clarified that it was a McCainian Lutheranism hermeneutic, although, anti-calvinist could also be a valid description. I was indeed responded to Rev. Paul McCain and his misrepresentations of Calvinism.
Post a Comment