If you enjoy the unity of Roman Catholic apologetics, you'll enjoy this one:
Tim Staples vs. Robert Sungenis
Highlights-
Staples: I sent a private email to a friend to warn her of Bob Sungenis’ whackiness” that was not intended to become public information. I am not going to enter into a lengthy argument with you about this. I have gone down that road before with Mr. Sungenis and I have made the judgment that it is not worth the time. But now that I have been threatened with some untold “consequences” for my actions, and I have been accused of “slander” by Mr. Sungenis, I will spell out for you SOME of the reasons why I said what I said to my friend.
Sungenis: The real problem, in my opinion, is that Catholic Answers (for whom Tim works) has chosen to take the politically correct road in their treatment of this issue. Karl Keating was sent my Galileo Was Wrong books, but as far as I know, he still hasn’t read them and has never interacted with any of the arguments presented in them. Instead, Karl keeps repeating the same elementary viewpoints he has used in the past, but which have all been scientifically disqualified.
Posts
5 comments:
All roads lead to Rome. Unfortunately, they can't agree on which Rome is the true Rome. They all lead to "Rome," but not necessarily to the same Rome. Kinda like Paris...Texas.
Steve,
You're being cynical. It's obvious, no... perspicuous, as to who represents the "True" church in this debate.
It's the guy who interprets Romanism correctly.
Well, they all report to the pope. I've been told that's the important thing.
Well, they all report to the pope.
Except Gerry Matatics and the other sedevacantists.
Mr. Staples goes in circles, and Mr. Sungenis has fallen off the map. What an apt analogy for their respective scientific opinions!
Post a Comment