"Where is your Christ? He is in heaven storing up wrath."
--My God is bigger than your God?
My Christ is in the bread and the wine; I eat him; he is in me and the person next to me. He dishes out grace upon grace. His name is Love and he comes to me. He comes to me in my brother and sister. He comes to me in humbleness and cross. My God is the smallest. He humbled himself to be my brother and friend, nourishment and strength. He still does. Nobody else has a God like that. I trust him because he meets my deepest need for mercy in the most scandalous way, so I cannot even get around that. His love disarms me. I will be happy to bow my knee to Him.
There is nothing contradictory in the video between the transcendent majesty/holiness/wrath of God vs. the love/immanence/humility of God demonstrated in Christ.
Whatever one's view of the Lord's supper is - whether the Lutheran consubstantiation view or Calvin's spiritual presence by faith for believers only, or the memorial view (Zwingli and most Baptists) - all of those Christians also agree that Christ is now in heaven in His resurrected body storing up wrath for unbelievers until the time of His second coming.
"My Christ is in the bread and the wine; I eat him . . . " - that is the Lutheran con-substantiation view - but it only for believers. ( I would assume.)
Unbelievers who take the Lord's supper who may think that by partaking of it they somehow "get a blessing" do not get a blessing - it is poison and judgment on them.
I would not say "My God is the smallest", but the eternal Son, He did humble Himself and become flesh and allowed Himself to be killed.
No, it is the body, even for unbelievers or even if the officiant is an unbeliever. The power is always in the word.
I've thought about the video since I've watched it, and while I agree with you Ken, that there are the two sides, I keep wondering why the video bothers me. For one thing words like "the eternality of his supremacy" sound weird, so do some of the other phrases. I don't know anyone who talks like this. It just does not resonate. And Luther always said we are to look at the revealed God, which is Christ in the flesh, the majesty is something we flee from. We can look that way only briefly (maybe such as the not being able to look at the face of God), and then fix our gaze on the cross of Calvary. We preach Christ and him crucified, said Paul. The Lord's Supper exactly preaches Christ and him crucified and brings him intimately to me (and you).
Certainly, they do NOT benefit. It is still Christ's body and blood. Luther's small catechism:
What is the benefit of such eating and drinking?
That is shown us in these words: Given, and shed for you, for the remission of sins; namely, that in the Sacrament forgiveness of sins, life, and salvation are given us through these words. For where there is forgiveness of sins, there is also life and salvation.
How can bodily eating and drinking do such great things?
It is not the eating and drinking, indeed, that does them, but the words which stand here, namely: Given, and shed for you, for the remission of sins. Which words are, beside the bodily eating and drinking, as the chief thing in the Sacrament; and he that believes these words has what they say and express, namely, the forgiveness of sins.
Who, then, receives such Sacrament worthily?
Fasting and bodily preparation is, indeed, a fine outward training; but he is truly worthy and well prepared who has faith in these words: Given, and shed for you, for the remission of sins.
But he that does not believe these words, or doubts, is unworthy and unfit; for the words For you require altogether believing hearts.
"He that has ever so little examined the citations of writers cannot doubt how little credit the quotations deserve when the originals are wanting"
xx
Looking for an Obscure Luther Quote? Chances are if you've wound up on this site, you're looking for information on an obscure quote said to come from Martin Luther or one of the other Protestant Reformers. This blog has been compiling information on obscure Reformation quotes for over a decade. Use the search engines below to look for your particular obscure quote.
“Let nobody suppose that he has tasted the Holy Scriptures sufficiently unless he has ruled over the churches with the prophets for a hundred years. Therefore there is something wonderful, first, about John the Baptist; second, about Christ; third, about the apostles...“We are beggars. That is true.” - Martin Luther
"It is true that the best apologetics can be given only when the system of truth is well known. But it is also true that the system of truth is not well known except it be seen in its opposition to error."- Cornelius Van Til
"But a most pernicious error widely prevails that Scripture has only so much weight as is conceded to it by the consent of the church. As if the eternal and inviolable truth of God depended upon the decision of men!"- John Calvin
"The Scriptures obtain full authority among believers only when men regard them as having sprung from heaven, as if there the living words of God were heard."- John Calvin
This is the best book available on Sola Scriptura. For Protestants, it will help you understand and defend sola scriptura. For Catholics, this book will help you understand exactly what Protestants mean by sola scriptura, rather than what you think it means. I highly recommend getting this book, it never leaves my desk, and serves as a valuable reference tool.
5 comments:
"Where is your Christ? He is in heaven storing up wrath."
--My God is bigger than your God?
My Christ is in the bread and the wine; I eat him; he is in me and the person next to me. He dishes out grace upon grace. His name is Love and he comes to me. He comes to me in my brother and sister. He comes to me in humbleness and cross. My God is the smallest. He humbled himself to be my brother and friend, nourishment and strength. He still does. Nobody else has a God like that. I trust him because he meets my deepest need for mercy in the most scandalous way, so I cannot even get around that. His love disarms me. I will be happy to bow my knee to Him.
There is nothing contradictory in the video between the transcendent majesty/holiness/wrath of God vs. the love/immanence/humility of God demonstrated in Christ.
Whatever one's view of the Lord's supper is - whether the Lutheran consubstantiation view or Calvin's spiritual presence by faith for believers only, or the memorial view (Zwingli and most Baptists) - all of those Christians also agree that Christ is now in heaven in His resurrected body storing up wrath for unbelievers until the time of His second coming.
"My Christ is in the bread and the wine; I eat him . . . "
- that is the Lutheran con-substantiation view - but it only for believers. ( I would assume.)
Unbelievers who take the Lord's supper who may think that by partaking of it they somehow "get a blessing" do not get a blessing - it is poison and judgment on them.
I would not say "My God is the smallest", but the eternal Son, He did humble Himself and become flesh and allowed Himself to be killed.
No, it is the body, even for unbelievers or even if the officiant is an unbeliever. The power is always in the word.
I've thought about the video since I've watched it, and while I agree with you Ken, that there are the two sides, I keep wondering why the video bothers me. For one thing words like "the eternality of his supremacy" sound weird, so do some of the other phrases. I don't know anyone who talks like this. It just does not resonate. And Luther always said we are to look at the revealed God, which is Christ in the flesh, the majesty is something we flee from. We can look that way only briefly (maybe such as the not being able to look at the face of God), and then fix our gaze on the cross of Calvary. We preach Christ and him crucified, said Paul. The Lord's Supper exactly preaches Christ and him crucified and brings him intimately to me (and you).
How does an unbeliever benefit from taking the Lord's supper, if they don't have faith in Christ?
"whatever is not from faith is sin"
Romans 14:23
"the righteous man shall live by faith"
Romans 1:17; Hab. 2:4
Certainly, they do NOT benefit. It is still Christ's body and blood.
Luther's small catechism:
What is the benefit of such eating and drinking?
That is shown us in these words: Given, and shed for you, for the remission of sins; namely, that in the Sacrament forgiveness of sins, life, and salvation are given us through these words. For where there is forgiveness of sins, there is also life and salvation.
How can bodily eating and drinking do such great things?
It is not the eating and drinking, indeed, that does them, but the words which stand here, namely: Given, and shed for you, for the remission of sins. Which words are, beside the bodily eating and drinking, as the chief thing in the Sacrament; and he that believes these words has what they say and express, namely, the forgiveness of sins.
Who, then, receives such Sacrament worthily?
Fasting and bodily preparation is, indeed, a fine outward training; but he is truly worthy and well prepared who has faith in these words: Given, and shed for you, for the remission of sins.
But he that does not believe these words, or doubts, is unworthy and unfit; for the words For you require altogether believing hearts.
Post a Comment