![](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEi9hiJ52gM__-Kyls5bMrBB4ve66i1kSQVnIJyA3YTkuHltI3q_6adeI5PLQHadnXYOrHbde3kGAadovGgdh6fWc5srPF2v3TDD5Cl1pq-2PyP-nZasYhkcZbZCh7MvO9QlbLCsKw/s200/expose.jpg)
"Be a sinner, and let your sins be strong, but let your trust in Christ be stronger, and rejoice in Christ who is the victor over sin, death, and the world. We will commit sins while we are here, for this life is not a place where justice resides... No sin can separate us from Him, even if we were to kill or commit adultery thousands of times each day" ['Let Your Sins Be Strong, from 'The Wittenberg Project;' 'The Wartburg Segment', translated by Erika Flores, from Dr. Martin Luther's Saemmtliche Schriften, Letter No. 99, 1 Aug. 1521. - Cf. Also Denifle’s Luther et Lutheranisme, Etude Faite d’apres les sources. Translation by J. Paquier (Paris, A. Picard, 1912-13), VOl. II, pg. 404].
Luther Exposing the Myth says their stated purpose is to show that "from Luther’s own words we shall see him for what he really was, that is a rebellious apostate, who abandoned the faith and led many into apostasy from God under the guise of “reformation” in order to follow his perverse inclinations." With this quote, they attempt to show Luther promoted sin.
Documentation
Luther, Exposing the Myth cites multiple references:
'Let Your Sins Be Strong, from 'The Wittenberg Project;' 'The Wartburg Segment', translated by Erika Flores, from Dr. Martin Luther's Saemmtliche Schriften, Letter No. 99, 1 Aug. 1521. - Cf. Also Denifle’s Luther et Lutheranisme, Etude Faite d’apres les sources. Translation by J. Paquier (Paris, A. Picard, 1912-13), VOl. II, pg. 404.The "Wittenberg Project" refers to Project Wittenberg, an on-line source for Luther-related documents. " 'The Wartburg Segment', translated by Erika Flores, from Dr. Martin Luther's Saemmtliche Schriften, Letter No. 99, 1 Aug. 1521" refers to this web page from Project Wittenberg. If one looks at the page carefully, it isn't "The Wartburg Segment" but rather It's a letter Luther composed "From the Wartburg" and only a segment is translated.
"Denifle’s Luther et Lutheranisme, Etude Faite d’apres les sources. Translation by J. Paquier (Paris, A. Picard, 1912-13), VOl. II, pg. 404" refers to Heinrich Denifle's second volume on Luther (in French, not available in English). Page 404 can be found here. and there is nothing remotely similar to the quote on this page. I would speculate that Luther, Exposing the Myth probably didn't use Denifle, but rather fished this reference out of Antonin Eymieu, Two Arguments for Catholicism (Burns, Oates and Washbourne, 1928 ) p. 47. They actually mis-cited the reference, as Eymieu cited page 207 (note 4) of Denifle for this quote, and then cited page 404 for an entirely different quote. Luther, Exposing The Myth didn't even lift this quote correctly from a secondary source!
The context for this quote is easy to track down. It's found in WA, Br 2, No. 424 , DeWette 2, 34, and in English in LW 48:277-282. On August 1, 1521 Luther wrote a letter that most scholars think was addressed to Phillip Melanchthon. The letter is now but a fragment. It has no address, salutation, or signature.
Context
If you are a preacher of grace, then preach a true and not a fictitious grace; if grace is true, you must bear a true and not a fictitious sin. God does not save people who are only fictitious sinners. Be a sinner and sin boldly, but believe and rejoice in Christ even more boldly, for he is victorious over sin, death, and the world. As long as we are here [in this world] we have to sin. This life is not the dwelling place of righteousness, but, as Peter says, we look for new heavens and a new earth in which righteousness dwells. It is enough that by the riches of God’s glory we have come to know the Lamb that takes away the sin of the world. No sin will separate us from the Lamb, even though we commit fornication and murder a thousand times a day. Do you think that the purchase price that was paid for the redemption of our sins by so great a Lamb is too small? Pray boldly—you too are a mighty sinner [LW 48:281-282].
Conclusion
I've written an extensive treatment of this quote: Did Luther say, “Be a sinner and sin boldly”? A Look at Justification By Faith Alone and Good Works in Luther’s Theology.
Luther was prone to strong hyperbole. It's his style, and this statement is a perfect example. The first thing to recognize is that the sentence is a statement of comparison. Luther's point is not to go out and commit multiple amounts of gleeful sin everyday, but rather to believe and rejoice in Christ even more boldly despite the sin in our lives. Christians have a real savior. No amount of sin is too much to be atoned for by a perfect savior whose righteousness is imputed to the sinner who reaches out in faith.
But what then is the practical application of sinning “boldly”? What is at the heart of this comparison? Luther explains elsewhere how to take on the attitude of sinning “boldly”:
Therefore let us arm our hearts with these and similar statements of Scripture so that, when the devil accuses us by saying: You are a sinner; therefore you are damned, we can reply: The very fact that you say I am a sinner makes me want to be just and saved. Nay, you will be damned, says the devil. Indeed not, I reply, for I take refuge in Christ, who gave Himself for my sins. Therefore you will accomplish nothing, Satan, by trying to frighten me by setting the greatness of my sins before me and thus seducing me to sadness, doubt, despair, hatred, contempt, and blasphemy of God. Indeed, by calling me a sinner you are supplying me with weapons against yourself so that I can slay and destroy you with your own sword; for Christ died for sinners. Furthermore, you yourself proclaim the glory of God to me; you remind me of God's paternal love for me, a miserable and lost sinner; for He so loved the world that He gave His Son (John 3:16). Again, whenever you throw up to me that I am a sinner, you revive in my memory the blessing of Christ, my Redeemer, on whose shoulders, and not on mine, lie all my sins; for "the Lord hath laid on Him the iniquity of us all" and "for the transgression of His people was He stricken" (Is. 53:6-8). Therefore when you throw up to me that I am a sinner, you are not terrifying me; you are comforting me beyond measure[Ewald Plass, What Luther Says 3:1315].The strong hyperbolic comparison Luther makes between “sinning boldly” and believing and rejoicing in Christ “even more boldly” comes clear. When assaulted by the fear and doubt of Christ’s love because of previous sins or the remnants of sin in one’s life, one is thrust back into the arms of Christ “on whose shoulders, and not on mine, lie all my sins…”. Rather than promoting a license to sin by saying “sin boldly,” Luther compares the sinner to the perfect savior. Left in our sins we will face nothing but death and damnation. By Christ’s victory over sin, death, and the world, we stand clothed in His righteousness, the recipients of His grace, no matter what we have done.
No historical information exists that indicts Melanchthon of ever murdering or fornicating, even once. The point Luther is making is not to go out and murder or fornicate as much as possible, but rather to point out the infinite sacrifice of Christ’s atonement. There is no sin that Christ cannot cover. His atonement was of an infinite value. That this statement was not to be considered literally is apparent by Luther’s use of argumentum ad absurdum: do people really commit fornication and murder a thousand times a day? No. Not even the most heinous God-hating sinner is able to carry out such a daily lifestyle.
Addendum
Sometimes this quote is cited like this:
If you are a preacher of grace, then preach a true and not a fictitious grace; if grace is true, you must bear a true and not a fictitious sin. God does not save people who are only fictitious sinners. Be a sinner and sin boldly, but believe and rejoice in Christ even more boldly . . . as long as we are here [in this world] we have to sin. . . . No sin will separate us from the Lamb, even though we commit fornication and murder a thousand times a day.”(Letter to Melanchthon, August 1, 1521, American Edition, Luther’s Works, vol. 48, pp. 281-82)
This is the way Shoebat.com's article, Martin Luther The Bare Truth Unfolded cites it, as well as their article, Martin Luther Was Satanic, If He Were Alive Today He Would Be No Different Than Any Of These Sick Heretics Who Encourage Evil And Sin. If you find the quote cited this way, the source for this appears to have originally come from Father William Most, Luther's Morals. Most put's forth the quote as follows:
< Letter to Melanchthon>, August 1, 1521 (American Edition,, vol. 48, pp. 281-82, edited by H. Lehmann, Fortress, 1963): "If you are a preacher of grace, then preach a true and not a fictitious grace; if grace is true, you must bear a true [p. 282] and not a fictitious sin. God does not save people who are only fictitious sinners. "(emphasis added).
Nice. This is my favorite one yet, because I think I have heard this quote and thought it pretty much had to mean what you pointed out; the hyperbole, the comparison with the incomparable riches of God's grace... Keep em coming!
ReplyDeleteYet I wonder how many Roman Catholics are more convinced in their religion because someone said, "Hey, you can't be a Protestant and a good Christian because Luther said 'sin boldly.'"
ReplyDeleteThe sheer volume of untruths that one must basically swallow in order to be Roman Catholic in good stead is just mind-boggling to me.
Hmm... thanks for that reminder, John, because I grew up nominally (not quite culturally Catholic). I did not have a "Catholic consciousness," so when I first heard the statement, it made a sort of intuitive sense--I thought something like this: "there's no half-way to Hell, you're going or you're not, and the only way to not go is by the grace of the Lord Jesus Christ." I wondered at my half-attempts at righteousness. I say "half," because I fairly well had myself convinced that if I didn't sin too much, it'd go easier on me...such is the mind of an unbeliever!
ReplyDeleteEvery so often it hits me how amazing His grace is, how much it overcame and overcomes.
Hi Pastor Aaron, do you consider that you were an "unbeliever" while you were still a Roman Catholic?
ReplyDeleteHi John,
ReplyDeleteYes, I do think I was an unbeliever. I can't really speak with any authority about what "real" Catholics learn or think; some like my grandfather clearly had an evangelical confession, while others seem to just "be Catholic." I did not believe that Jesus saved me from my sins while I was a child. That did not happen until I was long out of church in college, and I was brought to faith by three Baptists, an Episcopalian, and a Reformed guy.
I did not believe that Jesus saved me from my sins while I was a child.
ReplyDeleteThis is one of the tragedies of Roman Catholicism.
I think I should more accurately say, I did not know that that was what Christianity was about, that Jesus saved me. Some of that is because we just did not go to church unless we were at my grandparents'. but I went to Cathoilic School for four years, and at best, when I walked away, I walked away from the idea of God more than any teachings of the faith-- because I did not know what those teachings were.
ReplyDeleteI am heading out of town, so if there is a follow up and i don't respond, I am not being rude...
Curious, where in the Bible does it state that one day the true faith will be lost and will then be found again? This would support the Reformation. I've only read scriptures that warm is against people like Luther, etc. People coming out of the flock deceiving the disciples (Acts 20:28-30) and that one day, people will find teachers that sits their own desires abandoning sound doctrine and going off into myths. How can you defend the Reformation when the Bible clearly speaks against it?
ReplyDelete-ex JW
How do you know it wasn't the pope who, as one supposedly among the flock (see Acts 20:29) who was deceiving, and Luther the prophet sent to set them straight?
ReplyDelete"the true faith" was not lost, but rather eclipsed and hidden out of touch/reach by other things. (centuries of build up of man-made traditions.
ReplyDeleteTrue faith cannot be lost - Matthew 16:16-18; John 10:27-30; Philippians 1:6; Romans 8:28-39
But individual local churches can apostatize and leave the faith.
Galatians 1:6-9; 5:4
Revelation chapters 2-3
2:4-5 - you have left your first love"
"I will remove your lamp stand if you don't repent" (2:5)
"I will make war against you, if you don't repent", (2:16), etc.
Historical developments - man-made traditions that caused the gospel message to be eclipsed and hidden
ReplyDeletehttp://beggarsallreformation.blogspot.com/2012/08/historical-developments-that-led-to.html
When you examine everything Mr Luther taught and said, the picture becomes very clear that this was a carnal man and a false teacher, full of sin and evil. He was a violent man and a persecutor of the Jews, who laid the groundwork for the Holocaust.
ReplyDeleteMr Luther rejected entire books of the Bible! Including the epistle of James, which he utterly rejected, because that book utterly refutes Mr Luther's twisted, demonic theology.
Mr Luther's quote here is yet another admission that he had a sinful heart and was overcome with evil desires. A man of God? Never!
This article claims that Mr Luther's only point was that we should "believe and rejoice in Christ even more boldly despite the sin in our lives". What "sin in our lives"?
John 8:11
"Go and sin no more!"
1 John 3:9
"Whoever has been born of God does not sin, for His seed remains in him; and he cannot sin, because he has been born of God."
Hebrews 10:26
"If we sin willfully after we have received the knowledge of the truth, there no longer remains a sacrifice for sins, but a certain fearful expectation of judgment, and fiery indignation which will devour the adversaries."
Mr Luther teaches that Paul was talking about himself in Romans 7, when he described a slave to sin, growing more and more corrupt every day, unable to do what is good! Apparently Mr Luther had never read the next chapter, which says:
Romans 8:2
"The law of the Spirit of life in Christ Jesus has made me free from the law of sin and death."
Romans 8:13
"If you live according to the flesh you will die; but if by the Spirit you put to death the deeds of the body, you will live."
Mr Luther describes himself as having an internal feud between evil desires and the desire to do what is right. It is clear that Mr Luther was still in bondage to his flesh, having not put his flesh to death and turned from all his evil ways.
1 John 5:3
"For this is the love of God, that we keep His commandments. And His commandments are not burdensome."
Lee:
ReplyDeleteI have examined a great deal of what Luther taught and said and arrived at the exact opposite conclusion, so one of us is blatantly wrong. The proof that I have examined a great deal of what Luther taught and said is this very blog (which dates back to 2006). Over the years, I have addressed your points, some repeatedly, some in tedious detail. We could go through each of your points, and I would demonstrate not only do you have a skewed view of history, your theology rings of pelagianism.
Nowhere on this blog though do I claim Luther was sinless or perfect. He was a man with sins and faults that achieved great things.