tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-19795707.post9159942935804696463..comments2024-03-22T16:09:48.895-04:00Comments on Beggars All: Reformation And Apologetics: Helpful MariolatryJames Swanhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/16136781934797867593noreply@blogger.comBlogger10125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-19795707.post-43078888094979646932011-02-27T11:11:08.190-05:002011-02-27T11:11:08.190-05:00Using quotes doesn't make the Catholic Champio...<i>Using quotes doesn't make the Catholic Champion blink</i><br /><br />Behold the power of the Catholic Champion!James Swanhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16136781934797867593noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-19795707.post-68789510112467895642011-02-26T19:31:49.072-05:002011-02-26T19:31:49.072-05:00Using quotes doesn't make the Catholic Champio...Using quotes doesn't make the Catholic Champion blink. I once quoted JP2 and an official church document to show him that his wasn't the only "official" Catholic interpretation. He dismissed my entire argument, telling me that I need to read his blog more carefully.<br /><br />Granted, I really <em>didn't</em> read to the end of the post I critiqued. So maybe he had a point. Still, the quotes I gave him <em>did</em> contradict the position he held, and he admitted to knowing of the documents that I quoted. But how he still maintained his was the official Catholic position I'll never know, and he never told me.<br /><br />Recently, <a href="http://wp.me/p2bFc-K2" rel="nofollow">I wrote a post pointing out that his analysis of a recent news item was misleading</a>, and counted 3 (!) logical fallacies that he and a fellow commenter committed in arguing with a Protestant.<br /><br />His reply? He seized on one error I made in my post (which had NOTHING to do with the substance of the post), wrote <a href="http://catholicchampion.blogspot.com/2011/02/no-trace-of-catholic-marian-dogmas-in.html" rel="nofollow">a lengthy blog post</a> on the topic, and challenged me to debate him on it. I admitted my mistake and asked him if he got anything else out of the post, like perhaps the SUBJECT OF THE POST, HIS ERRORS IN LOGIC?<br /><br />No reply yet. I'm not holding my breath.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-19795707.post-68992750578333380042011-02-25T12:38:36.749-05:002011-02-25T12:38:36.749-05:00Bummer, I still want him to answer that question a...Bummer, I still want him to answer that question about whether Pope Benny16 or Robert Sungenis was correct.Rhologyhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14245825667079220242noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-19795707.post-84686120296841959262011-02-24T21:53:47.843-05:002011-02-24T21:53:47.843-05:00I just get angry on poor, dear, blessed Mary's...<i>I just get angry on poor, dear, blessed Mary's behalf. That would be her worst nightmare to have a devision in Christianity over the honoring of herself.</i><br /><br />Well said.James Swanhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16136781934797867593noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-19795707.post-13134320353401852672011-02-24T21:53:00.346-05:002011-02-24T21:53:00.346-05:00Like, I think the ol' Catholic Champion is rea...Like, I think the ol' Catholic Champion is really showing admirable restraint these days. Remember the days when he'd fly over here shooting at anything that moved? <br /><br />I guess once we started deleting most of his comments, it finally sunk in.James Swanhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16136781934797867593noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-19795707.post-42308528117117452212011-02-24T12:26:44.927-05:002011-02-24T12:26:44.927-05:00I just get angry on poor, dear, blessed Mary's...I just get angry on poor, dear, blessed Mary's behalf. That would be her worst nightmare to have a devision in Christianity over the honoring of herself.Brigittehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10259491144770243688noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-19795707.post-73555880954508194512011-02-24T11:01:10.678-05:002011-02-24T11:01:10.678-05:00"Spouse of God." Catholic theology meets..."Spouse of God." Catholic theology meets Mormon theology. <br /><br />Or Roman mythology (Juno, wife of Jupiter).stevehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16547070544928321788noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-19795707.post-7383767787019708372011-02-24T07:28:59.831-05:002011-02-24T07:28:59.831-05:00"Helpful Mariolatry"
That's an inte..."Helpful Mariolatry"<br /><br />That's an interesting choice for a blog post title!Truth Unites... and Divideshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08891402278361538353noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-19795707.post-91382987410602607682011-02-24T01:12:33.274-05:002011-02-24T01:12:33.274-05:00In denying the divine motherhood of Mary
That'...<i>In denying the divine motherhood of Mary</i><br /><br />That's disturbing.zipper778https://www.blogger.com/profile/03461482876486910840noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-19795707.post-11023851793543837292011-02-24T00:32:32.027-05:002011-02-24T00:32:32.027-05:00We can read in the little treatise sourced here th...We can read in the little treatise sourced here that Mary is the "spouse" of God. I always thought it was the church who is the bride of Christ.Brigittehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10259491144770243688noreply@blogger.com