tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-19795707.post3811698265178689406..comments2024-03-22T16:09:48.895-04:00Comments on Beggars All: Reformation And Apologetics: Luther, Sproul, and Private InterpretationJames Swanhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/16136781934797867593noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-19795707.post-74008962137734296982014-01-12T07:53:19.926-05:002014-01-12T07:53:19.926-05:00The first statement is meaningless, because even t...<br />The first statement is meaningless, because even the limits are open to interpretation.<br /><br /><br />A related issue is with the word "infallible." If Rome wanted to argue that the the RC has interpreted the entire Bible by "setting limits" on what is acceptable interpretation without using the word "infallible," I wouldn't have much of a problem with that, but she'll never do that. <br /><br />James Swanhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16136781934797867593noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-19795707.post-35916068465476753992014-01-09T18:50:36.096-05:002014-01-09T18:50:36.096-05:00Hi
One RC person on OLTS said that the RC has inf...Hi<br /><br />One RC person on OLTS said that the RC has infallibly interpreted the entire Bible by "setting limits" on what is acceptable interpretation. <br /><br />In a similar way, Madrid says that the practices of the RCC reflects how it interprets. <br /><br />What do you make of these opinions?<br /><br />Thanks.explorerhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05898412174864424361noreply@blogger.com